Jharkhand News: Former DDC Arvind Kumar Chaudhary Denied Bail by Ranchi Civil Court in Sexual Exploitation Case

Ranchi, December 20, 2024: The Ranchi Civil Court has rejected the anticipatory bail plea of former Deputy Development Commissioner (DDC), Arvind Kumar Chaudhary, in a sexual exploitation case spanning over 16 years. The decision, delivered by Additional Sessions Judge Manish Ranjan, has significant implications for the ongoing legal proceedings against the retired official.

Court’s Decision on Bail Plea

The court denied bail to both Arvind Kumar Chaudhary and his son, Manish Anand, who were co-accused in the case. Representing the victim, Supreme Court advocate Shishir Raj presented compelling arguments highlighting the severity of the allegations.

Judge Ranjan ruled that granting bail could potentially hinder the investigation, given the gravity of the charges. The court emphasized the need for a thorough probe into the matter to ensure justice for the victim.

Details of the Allegations

The case revolves around a widow from Namkum, who accused Arvind Kumar Chaudhary of exploiting her under the pretext of marriage. The victim alleged that the ordeal began in 2008, when she met Arvind Kumar Chaudhary while seeking employment in Pakur.

According to the victim’s testimony, Arvind Kumar Chaudhary promised her a job and later coerced her into a sexual relationship at a hotel in Pakur. When she resisted, Arvind Kumar allegedly assured her of marriage, leading to continued exploitation.

The allegations further state that Arvind Kumar Chaudhary maintained the relationship during his tenure in Lohardaga, where he was transferred. Despite his retirement in 2012, the victim claims the exploitation persisted.

Victim’s Perspective

The victim described her prolonged ordeal in court, asserting that she had placed trust in Arvind Kumar Chaudhary’s promises. She also highlighted the emotional and psychological trauma she endured over the years.

Her legal counsel argued that the exploitation was not only a breach of trust but also a gross misuse of power by a public servant.

Legal Implications and Investigation

The rejection of the bail plea signals a robust stance by the judiciary in cases involving sexual exploitation and abuse of authority. Legal experts suggest that the decision could set a precedent for similar cases, emphasizing accountability for those in positions of power.

The investigation, which is still ongoing, will now proceed with Arvind Kumar Chaudhary and his son under scrutiny. Authorities are expected to gather additional evidence to substantiate the victim’s claims and ensure a fair trial.

Background on Arvind Kumar Chaudhary

Arvind Kumar Chaudhary served as the Deputy Development Commissioner before retiring in 2012. His tenure was marked by various administrative roles, but the current allegations have cast a shadow over his career.

The case has sparked discussions about the misuse of authority and the importance of safeguarding vulnerable individuals from exploitation.

Community Reactions

The case has drawn significant attention from the public and legal community alike. Advocacy groups have lauded the court’s decision, viewing it as a step toward justice for survivors of sexual exploitation.

Meanwhile, Arvind Kumar Chaudhary’s legal team has maintained his innocence, stating that the allegations are baseless and politically motivated. They plan to challenge the court’s decision in a higher judiciary.